
Writing
On decision systems, AI governance, human-in-the-loop oversight, and the risk frameworks that bind AI to a defensible record. No vendor pitches. No predictions.
Editorial stance
Working definitions, working patterns, and the references that hold up under audit.
All Essays
20 essays — search by title, topic, or tag.
AI agent vs AI assistant comes down to autonomy, scope, tools, and persistence. Here is the four-dimension test and what each implies for oversight.
An AI audit produces four artefacts: decision log, model card, risk register, refusal log. Internal, external, and continuous audit modes mapped to NIST AI RMF.
AI for decision making works inside a bounded scope, refuses on irreversible commitments, and operates through a constraint gate. Here is the framework.
AI guardrails come in four types: input, output, behavioural, and policy. Where each fits in the request lifecycle, how they fail, and how to test them.
AI red teaming is structured pre-deployment testing for failure. Four test classes, the five-stage engagement, and how findings feed your refusal contracts.
Automated decision making works in three contexts and fails in three. Here is the operational test, the GDPR Article 22 obligation, and the four artefacts that make it defensible.
Decision intelligence is a discipline, not a dashboard. Here is the working definition, the three pillars, and how the field differs from BI, AI alone, and DSS.
A decision intelligence platform enforces rules before commitment, not after. Here is the structural test that tells real platforms apart from rebadged BI dashboards.
A decision support system is the classical software category. Anatomy, four DSS types, and how DSS differs from decision intelligence and decision systems.
Human-in-the-loop AI keeps a person in the decision path. Here are the three patterns, four conditions for meaningful oversight, and how the EU AI Act treats it.
AI contextual governance frameworks replace static rules with situational oversight. Learn the three-tier model, its primary focuses, and how to apply it to any AI deployment.
A practical guide to assessing AI readiness across 7 governance dimensions. Covers the framework consultants use, scoring methodology, and the 90-day action plan.
An AI policy is not a list of prohibitions. It defines approved uses, data handling rules, refusal conditions, HITL requirements, and incident response. This post walks through every section.
Most AI risk assessment templates are spreadsheets that organisations fill in once and never look at again. This post covers the 12-dimension scoring model that produces actionable HITL placement recommendations.
Generic prompt libraries optimise for productivity. A governance prompt library optimises for accountability. This post explains the distinction and walks through three governance prompts in detail.
Accountability, transparency, and control are the three primary focuses of AI governance frameworks. This post explains what each requires in practice and why all three are necessary.
A decision system enforces constraints, order, and verification before commitment. Learn the definition, examples, and how it differs from decision support and AI agents.
A practical guide to building an AI risk management framework. Covers NIST AI RMF (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage), ISO/IEC 42001, and an enterprise rollout plan.
An AI system that cannot refuse is a liability. This essay explains why refusal is a feature, what conditions should trigger it, and how to design it in.
AI agents complete tasks. AI employees hold a bounded role with authority and accountability. A practical comparison across scope, authority, oversight, and use.
Topic cluster
These essays sit around a central pillar — what a decision system is. Each one is readable independently and links to the others where the topic naturally crosses over.